Friday, 22 June 2012

Learning Disabilities: classification, lags




General – Lags behind in most areas
Specific - Lags behind in a specific area



Developmental Consequences


3 Major Achievement Lags:
Reading - decoding, comprehension
Writing - spelling, written expression
Math - computation, problem solving, organizational problems, social interaction

Oral Language can also be a problem:  listening, speaking, understanding
 
Reading
  
Phonological Awareness   – Ability to blend, segment, rhyme, and manipulate the sound     of   the spoken word
Phonemic Awareness - Word recognition, word attack skills, fluency, comprehension, main idea, context and clues

Nonverbal Learning Disability = social and emotional development
35 % of students with nonverbal learning disabilities are neglected
15 % of students with nonverbal learning disabilities are rejected
They FAIL = They LOSE MOTIVATION 

Learning Disabilities Association of Canada

 www.ldao.ca







Thursday, 21 June 2012

Learning Disabilities: Assessment and Intervention



 Students with Learning Disabilities

Diagnosis is crucial and a thorough evaluation to narrow in on the kind of learning disability and to which degree the disability is and also where the child’s strengths and weaknesses are.

Identification early on is key!

Some issues regarding assessment are that there is a lack of coordination and too many parties contributing with different points of views, Such as teachers and specialists.

Components of Assessment:
Observation: What the student has been doing.
Collection of work and products
Discussions and Information obtained between important parties
Testing

Currently there isn’t just one system on how to identify learning disabilities.

When assessing a child personal judgment and experience helps to diagnosis.

The two main processes when for assessment are:
1. Screening
2. Psycho educational diagnosis which is based on educational tests and
psychological test

Diagnosis can be very expensive
Effective Assessments Include:

1.     Various sources have been used; (such as teachers, parents, other professionals.)
2.    If tests have been used are they reliable, and is the administrator properly qualified to be giving the tests?
3.    Has the assessment been altered to be subject’s culture, age, etc?
4.    Was the assessment ecological? Did it pertain to the subjects whole environment( Home, school, classroom situation)
5.    Does the assessment recommend responses: ways of enrichment or remediation
6.    Do parties involved believe that the assessment best represents the subject?

Curriculum - Based Assessment: Procedure that directly assesses student performance within the course content for the purpose of finding out the students instructional needs. 

Psychological Processing: Diagnosing processing deficiencies. This process can’t be directly observed so there is controversy over weather or not it can be properly diagnosed. Information about areas like auditory, visual, motor skills and kinesthetic functions are available. 
Medical Intervention: medicine and learning disabilities have been closely linked historically. Many have moved away from medical model to a diagnostic and educational model for remediation.
Drug Therapy
Technical Aids: Such as computer programs which help children who have troubles concentrating.
Also helps children who are unorganized to become organized
Learning disabled children who used a computer showed improvement in areas such as, reading, comprehension, spelling and comprehension of words.
Educational: Concerns for educators who are teaching a learning disabled child is how to set them up to succeed and how to design a program that will benefit the child.
Services:  Resource Rooms. Controversy over whether or not to segregate learning disabled children from the rest of the class? 
  • Most educators want the learning disabled child to be kept in the regular classroom with full time support.
  • Great reluctance to segregate learning disabled children from regular classrooms.
  • Prefer to have the students in the classroom with full time support.
  • Some research shows that inclusion can benefit academically, that learning disabled children who were included benefited academically.
  • Inclusion may benefit in certain subjects in school.
  • On the flip side studies and some educators found that children who were in classrooms designed specifically for learning disabled succeeded better then in a general classroom.
  • Specific classrooms help students who are learning disabled or who are emotionally disturbed 
  •  Inclusive placements have not always led to positive outcomes. Children with mild learning disabilities seem to be having the most problems with inclusion.
  • Found that when the children were included the outcome were “neither desirable nor acceptable”.
  • Even students in inclusive rooms with full time support did not make significant academic progress.
  • No evidence that either inclusion or segregation meets the needs of all students.

Wednesday, 20 June 2012

Speech and Language: issues related to inclusion

Issues Related to Inclusion for Speech and Language Disorders



  • Literacy skills suffer and children with speech and language delays tend to have difficulty coping with academic subjects.
  • There are perceived bahaviour disorders since these children don't feel understood, they appear to not conform.
  • Withdrawal from social contact, embarrassment, guilt, anger, anxiety, low self-esteem and aggression all affect school performance
  • Poor self perception and lower school achievement are common with students having physical impairments, i.e. clefts  
Language problems are generally assessed by a team comprising of a psychologist, a speech clinician, a physician, an educator and possibly a neurologist. Ruling out low IQ and hearing loss then testing linguistic and cognitive skills. Most school boards have speech and language specialists that are available to provide direct intervention in the classroom. However availability is subject to the individual school board.

Clues to a Speech or Language Disorder
·         Does the student follow simple directions?
·         Does the student understand the meanings of words that others understand?
·         Does the student have a limited vocabulary compared with age peers?
·         Does the student understand longer, more complex sentences?
·         Does the student follow the general rules of grammar?
·         Does the student have more than normal difficulty finding the correct word?
 

General classroom instruction seems more appropriate for children with speech and language differences. Modelling functional communication and conversational skills.

·       Direct Teaching –Teachers respond to communicative attempts    to encourage more elaborate speech and language.

·       Naturalistic Approach – Through social interaction, using functional language that is useful and relevant in a child’s everyday activities.

Making the classroom an enjoyable  and comfortable place for the student to work on his/her speech and language  is key.