Tuesday 5 June 2012

 Issues Related to Inclusion for Students with 
Pervasive Developmental Disorders

"Historically, students presenting intensive educational challenges to our schools have been served outside the general classroom and, in many cases, outside the community school" (Winzer, 477).

Today, a greater variety of educational options are available for children with ASDs and childhood onset schizophrenia.  However, because of the nature of the symptoms of pervasive developmental disorders including autism and psychosis, educators and parents are often at odds about the best placement options.  The pros and cons of full educational inclusion include:
                 
                                        
Attitude - all students should be educated in neighborhood 
schools within general classrooms                   
Typical students become more accepting          
of human differences and show less                  
discomfort interacting with people who           
have disabilities

Curriculum can be modified
With support, all teachers can learn to include all students
Training often emphasizes early developmental skills and not
those needed for adult independence

Inclusion would require substantive changes
to all aspects of the education system

Generally, the more severe the disability, the more negative the
attitudes of the classroom teachers

The gap between students may be too great for interaction to occur;
Students with pervasive developmental disorders do not interact with
peers unless they are supported and encouraged to do so

3 comments:

  1. More evidence to the fact that EA's are needed in the classrooms, to support the teacher but most of all the student. Supporting them with curriculum and social interactions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. While the there is definitely pros and cons to inclusion I think one of the major issues that need to be addressed is the all or nothing approach the education systems seems to take when dealing with exceptionalities

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with bugsmom. When taking the all or nothing approach to the discussion of inclusion it seems the issue itself becomes more important than the kids involved. By insisting on one approach only, it takes away the right of parents and children who believe the other approach, or a combination of both, is going to be better for their child.

    ReplyDelete